Article

Non-Collaborative Behavior = Ohio agreement to join Great Lakes water plan stalls again

Posted  by I-Open Team.

PublicCategorized as Collaboration.

Tagged with great lakes basin compact.

Single agendas have no place in large scale collaborations that engage multi-state agreements and alignment of resources. The cost is high: time investment (just think of calculating one Governor and that Office's staff time, then multiply by eight states), tried patience, and a splintering of camps generating what Jack Ricchiuto calls, "shadow conversations" deteriorating future interest in the next collaboration opportunity. Worse yet, people act as if we have time. What do citizens have to say about this? Is this efficient and productive? What's your take on this?

Ohio agreement to join Great Lakes water plan stalls again

http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/michigan/index.ssf?/base/business-16/121210824667780.xml&storylist=michigannews

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — A plan to remove Ohio as the last roadblock to finishing an agreement among the Great Lakes states to protect their water ran into a barrier on Thursday — again. Read the full article.



Arrow_down Hide comments

Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States - The Institute for Open Economic Networks (I-Open)

Powered by Near-TimeTerms of Services | Privacy Policy | Security Policy |